🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear Ruben Amorim could survive a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered an important continental showpiece against one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, undermining some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach took on the executive and appears to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a manager who often railed at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his nine months of experience with the Saints, to view him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, he has demonstrated to be among football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Over System & Ideology

For example, this was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his favored formation. Naturally, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, holder of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as him – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

An Supreme Authority Behind Command

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style to football “will be determined by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Whom else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Order: Directors Over Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to join a club and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have such individuals set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not really creating the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged while the people who hired him live to blunder another day.

A Neoliberal Game: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the rise of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss them for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and then discard them for taking excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.